RyanCarey wrote:Fantastic to have you here. I couldn't agree with you more about the importance of following our logic, even when it leads to conclusions that may make you feel uncomfortable. Please do share the area on which you disagree with Peter Singer.
I can think of one: he supports American style university where most professions are studied postgraduately. Under that sort of system I would have had to study biomedical science for three years before starting medicine. Waste of time in my opinion (sorry Peter!)
This is something I'd like to take up in a philosophy thread. It's mainly to do his Animals rights arguments concerning similar interests and the oveall link between normative actions and desires. Basically he and others -if I have it right- think that rights and related preferences needs desires to ground them whereas I find this really strange as we deal with abstract interests all the time that have no basis in current desires. This follows onto other related subjects but I would like to flesh them out before going onto other topics.
The another one deals with the ethics of finite resources -which I'm only starting to study- and think that giving a small % of your income isn't nearly enough to be thought as doing the moral thing.
Cheers
Simon